Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The training data consists of about 13,000 shell commands from the author's own Agent conversation records, of which 696 commands not covered by deterministic rules were manually labeled; commands with a similarity of no less than 0.85 were excluded.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
11/3/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 2/1/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAn 8-bit small CPU computes 13 times 11, executing 38 instructions and generating 90 tokens, finally outputting 143; on 1,000 random programs and more than 1.16 million instructions, token-by-token comparison with the Python interpreter shows not a single discrepancy.65% similarUnverifiedPilot experiments had three coding agents and eight models each run eight 20-minute single-pass tasks, with label-aware F1 showing extremely high variance ranging from 0.143 to 0.892.60% similarUnverifiedWhen an agent is actually editing files, it may only be able to accommodate 5,000 to 10,000 lines of code at a time, because system prompts, tool definitions, conversation history, and other elements are all competing for the context window.60% similarUnverifiedAnthropic recruited 1,053 programmers for a controlled experiment, mixing dangerous commands into normal tasks; humans approved 800 dangerous commands while the machine missed only 6.59% similarUnverifiedIn Anthropic's tests, a codebase of 116,000 lines of code had 70 bugs planted in it; a single agent found 14, 15, and 27 bugs across three rounds respectively, while a multi-agent workflow consistently found 66 bugs across all three rounds.59% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1130046API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1130046MCP
get_claim(id=1130046)