Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In end-to-end testing (including deterministic rules), both the base model and the fine-tuned model intercepted all 13/13 real Claude Code hook events and 30/30 evasion attempts.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
11/3/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 2/1/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedClaude Code identified that the pre-treatment trends of the treatment and control groups were not parallel, but did not further test a more accurate model and completely skipped the A/A testing step.72% similarUnverifiedA PreToolUse hook, once added, blocks all 22 test commands without affecting normal feature-branch pushes.71% similarUnverifiedWhen invoking sub-agents during long sessions in Claude Code, the final wrap-up summary may produce incorrect conclusions—for example, a sub-agent's tests fail but the main conversation summary shows all tests passing.69% similarUnverifiedThe benchmark simulates 15 small pipeline scenarios; for each scenario, the ground truth of what actually happened is predetermined, some logs are deliberately removed, and answers are verified by pure code rather than an LLM judge.68% similarUnverifiedIf Claude Code finds that the result did not meet expectations during the validation phase, it automatically returns to the beginning of the loop to re-execute, rather than stopping to wait for user intervention after the first failure.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1130047API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1130047MCP
get_claim(id=1130047)