Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Writing the acceptance criteria into the prompt is equivalent to defining the expected shape of the diff in advance, so during review you only need to compare against the expectation to judge whether the changes are reasonable.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
11/3/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
VerifiedThe validator focuses on whether the result satisfies mechanically verifiable constraints and makes a binary, objective judgment; the evaluator focuses on whether the output quality meets the goal and makes a subjective judgment at the semantic level.78% similarUnverifiedClarifying acceptance criteria at the generation stage (upfront constraints) can move part of the review logic forward into generation constraints, reducing rework-style review.74% similarUnverifiedAcceptance criteria are specific, testable conditions for judging whether a requirement has been satisfied, usually written in Given-When-Then form.74% similarUnverifiedThe criterion for deciding whether to enable deterministic mode is: whether you are about to compare two runs and interpret the differences between them.73% similarUnverifiedIn evaluation set design, a holdout set refers to the portion of data deliberately kept out of the optimization process and used only for final validation, to detect overfitting, provided that the scorer definition reflects the good outputs you truly care about.73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1131433API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1131433MCP
get_claim(id=1131433)