Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The Agent sometimes changes places the user did not ask for, or uses a style inconsistent with the project, so item-by-item review is a necessary last line of defense.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
11/3/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedHaving the Agent plan first and then write code, and requiring human confirmation at uncertain points, can prevent rework caused by the Agent improvising.75% similarUnverifiedAgent blocking typically occurs when encountering operations that require manual confirmation, such as overwriting existing files, requesting additional permissions, handling ambiguous input, or encountering unexpected errors.74% similarUnverifiedA common approach to countering agents amplifying the spread of over-design is to explicitly add constraints to the agent context (such as 'only implement the requirements covered by the current test cases, do not add unused parameters or configuration options'), and to make 'whether it serves the current requirement' a separate review question in the review step.74% similarUnverifiedThe key difference between agent workloads and traditional single-inference calls is that a single user request unfolds into a call chain of uncertain length, each step must carry historical context, and external side effects may be triggered.73% similarUnverifiedAgents should first go live in suggestion-only mode to generate drafts, with reasons for reviewers' edits or rejections recorded, before gradually automating low-risk requests.73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1131434API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1131434MCP
get_claim(id=1131434)