Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
In standard multi-agent debate, the adoption rate of unsafe advice surged from a very low level to near-total, while systematically suppressing safe minority evidence.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
11/4/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOnce a public benchmark attracts widespread attention, it risks being targeted for optimization, and high scores do not necessarily reflect generalized reasoning ability.76% similarUnverifiedCritics point out that the low-probability, high-impact framework has room for manipulation—probabilities can be arbitrarily lowered and impacts can be arbitrarily raised—making it easy to fall into Pascal's-wager-style argumentation traps.71% similarUnverifiedThere is an inherent tension in dangerous capability assessments between the coverage, update frequency, and confidentiality of test sets: overly public test sets become incorporated into training data and lose effectiveness, while overly confidential tests lack peer-review credibility.70% similarUnverifiedExpectation violation theory holds that when an information source repeatedly sets high expectations but delivers low verification, audiences will gradually lower their credibility assessment of all subsequent claims from that source.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1133960API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1133960MCP
get_claim(id=1133960)