Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
Compared with direct prompting and the Value of Information method suited to specific scenarios, CVD performs better across a broad range of scenarios.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
11/5/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 2/3/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedPlacing the most important instructions at the beginning or end of a prompt generally yields better results, because the attention mechanism assigns higher weight to information at specific positions.71% similarUnverifiedUsers generally believe that acceptance of proactive suggestions is strongly scenario-dependent, with higher acceptance in structured tasks and lower acceptance during real-time calls or deep work.70% similarUnverifiedReasoning effort allows users to choose among low/medium/high levels how much thinking depth the model invests; higher levels yield better output quality but greater latency and cost.69% similarUnverified研究表明在提示词中加入反例说明（即不要做什么）能显著提升生成质量69% similarUnverifiedSupplementing items with additional knowledge information (such as genre and director) can reduce the utility gap at the group level, with little impact on overall recommendation utility.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1137738API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1137738MCP
get_claim(id=1137738)