Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The framework's memory layer records the code diff, error logs, and model explanation of each fix attempt, and when a new request arrives, retrieves similar historical failure patterns and injects them into the prompt.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
11/6/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 2/4/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedStructured failure memory saves each round's plan, failure reasons, and scope of changes, so the next attempt continues with this information.79% similarUnverifiedSwitching models causes context cache invalidation, requiring the re-injection of state such as codebase structure, task objectives, and completed steps via prompts, consuming additional tokens and potentially introducing errors.76% similarUnverifiedsemantic-registry stores correction signals (task description, wrongly selected tool, correct tool) in a feedback log, and adjusts recall ranking through a re-ranking model or similarity weighting.75% similarUnverifiedBefore modifying the Prompt again, first read several complete records of Agent failures; usually you will find the root cause lies in tool design (misreading tools, being flooded by output, repeatedly retrying on errors it cannot understand), rather than in the Prompt itself.73% similarUnverifiedKeeping an error log recording the error message, root cause, and correct approach helps identify recurring pitfalls.72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1143077API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1143077MCP
get_claim(id=1143077)