Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The computation of the Recall Fidelity Score depends on defining semantically similar events, and this process itself may contain noise.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
11/10/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedSeparate elicitation versus joint elicitation changed the pattern of results in the conjunction judgments, but interpretation is limited by between-call noise.80% similarVerifiedBatch normalization layers have highly noisy statistical estimates in small-batch scenarios, and combined with the region-level computation characteristics of Dice loss, this amplifies fluctuations in the predicted probability distribution.77% similarUnverifiedDue to the non-determinism of floating-point operation order, batch reductions, and parallel computation, the logits at each position within the verification window carry tiny numerical noise; when the window is long or the model is large, this noise may change the accept/reject boundary decisions, causing the actual sampling distribution to deviate from the theoretical distribution.76% similarUnverifiedIn traditional simulations, if factual and counterfactual trajectories are generated independently, differences in random noise drown out the intervention signal.76% similarVerifiedA similarity threshold that is too high may cause valid answers to be incorrectly filtered out, while one that is too low may introduce noise, requiring a trade-off between recall and precision.75% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1153238API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1153238MCP
get_claim(id=1153238)