Verified75% confidenceFactTime unknown
In 2022, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in hiQ Labs v. LinkedIn that scraping publicly available data does not violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
5
Sources
75%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
5/31/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedA U.S. court ruled in hiQ v. LinkedIn that scraping publicly available data is protected under the First Amendment.73% similarUnverifiedThe 2022 U.S. case hiQ Labs v. LinkedIn affirmed the legality of scraping publicly available data, while the EU's GDPR imposes strict restrictions on the scraping of personal data.72% similarUnverifiedIn 2022, the Ninth Circuit Court ruled that scraping publicly accessible data does not violate the CFAA, but LinkedIn promptly filed a new lawsuit and ultimately reached a settlement.72% similarUnverified在2023年Hachette v. Internet Archive案中，纽约联邦地区法院判定互联网档案馆的'受控数字借阅'模式不构成合理使用69% similarUnverified2019年巧达科技因违规爬取平台数据被追究法律责任65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/11672API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/11672MCP
get_claim(id=11672)