Expired90% confidenceFactTime unknown
In the medium question (MCP protocol client Signal forwarding), GLM 5.1 wrote 108 lines of tests, which is 1.3 times that of Sonnet and 2 times that of Kimi.
1
Sources
90%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
5/31/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 8/29/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the easy question, GLM 5.1 added 19 lines of tests, Kimi K2.6 added 12 lines, while the other five models (including Sonnet 4.6) wrote zero lines of tests.75% similarUnverifiedThe previous-generation Sonnet 4.5 scored 61.4% on the OSWorld Verified benchmark.71% similarUnverifiedSonnet 5's performance is roughly equivalent to GLM 5.2 high, but is priced at approximately three times the cost of the latter and possesses revision capabilities that GLM 5.2 lacks67% similarUnverifiedSonnet 4.6 scored 72.5% on the OS World Verified benchmark.66% similarUnverifiedOn the SWE Bench Pro programming benchmark, Sonnet 5 achieved 63.2% and Opus 4.8 achieved 69.2%.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/13175API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/13175MCP
get_claim(id=13175)