Unverified90% confidenceFactTime unknown
在普通题（MCP协议客户端Signal转发）中，GLM 5.1写了108行测试，是Sonnet的1.3倍，Kimi的2倍
1
Sources
90%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
5/31/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 8/29/2026
Sources
7个AI修同一个Bug实测：GLM 5.1反超Claude Sonnet详细对比
bilibili寒冰巨魔9527
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified在简单题中，GLM 5.1补了19行测试，Kimi K2.6补了12行，其他五个模型（包括Sonnet 4.6）一行测试都没写75% similarUnverified上一代Sonnet 4.5在OS World Verified基准测试中得分61.4%71% similarUnverifiedSonnet 5 性能大致相当于 GLM 5.2 high 水平，但价格约为后者的三倍，并拥有 GLM 5.2 不具备的修订能力67% similarUnverifiedSonnet 4.6在OS World Verified基准测试中得分72.5%66% similarUnverified在SWE Bench Pro编程基准测试中，Sonnet 5取得63.2%，Opus 4.8取得69.2%65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/13175API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/13175MCP
get_claim(id=13175)