Expired85% confidenceEventTime unknown
Gemma 4 27B and Qwen 3.5 failed on the same LTE modem reverse engineering task.
1
Sources
85%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
5/31/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 8/29/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIf Gemma 3 12B frequently makes errors on structured output, it is recommended to switch to the Qwen 2.5 series or Llama 3.1 8B/70B, as they have better native support for Function Calling.74% similarUnverifiedIn a complex task test involving the generation of a visualization HTML for six sorting algorithms, Gemini 3.1 and Qwen 3.5 400B succeeded, while the local version of QwenCoder 80B failed.64% similarUnverifiedPreviously, Gemma 4:31b had issues with failed tool calls on Ollama.64% similarUnverifiedThe original Qwen3.6 27B Q4 scored 97 in the tool-calling test, demonstrating that distillation does not always improve performance.62% similarUnverifiedGemma 4 completed the entire development task in only 43% of the time taken by Qwen 3.6.60% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/13905API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/13905MCP
get_claim(id=13905)