Unverified80% confidenceFactTime unknown
PU中底比EVA更耐用抗压缩变形寿命长，但更重且低温易变硬开裂；EVA轻软缓震好但里程久后塌陷快
1
Sources
80%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
-
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedEVA发泡防撞条密度越高(更结实)缓冲越硬，密度越低(更软)越易被抠掉或撕坏，家有已能用手抠东西的幼儿应选中高密度并配隐藏边压条防被撕69% similarUnverifiedEPP材质相比EPS更耐摔耐用、可反复使用寿命长，EPS(泡沫箱)成本低但易碎裂掉渣，长期反复使用应选EPP67% similarUnverified海绵密度与去污/耐用成正比：低密度泡棉手感松软但一挤就变形、易撕裂，寿命短；选择时可捏压测试，回弹快、无明显永久凹陷的高密度款更耐用67% similarUnverified闭孔EVA材质比开孔泡沫吸水率低（<2% vs >10%），长期泡水不易变形发黄，选购时用指甲按压回弹快且表面无粉末脱落的为闭孔EVA66% similarUnverified厚度与防滑存在权衡：EVA发泡垫越厚缓震越好但表面偏滑，需选带凹凸纹理或双面颗粒的款；镂空网格PVC垫防滑好但缓震几乎为零66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/140473API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/140473MCP
get_claim(id=140473)