Unverified80% confidenceFactTime unknown
EVA中底缓震初期舒适但压缩衰减快、寿命短；PU中底更耐久支撑好但偏硬重；部分高端款用双密度EVA或超临界发泡兼顾回弹与耐久
1
Sources
80%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
-
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified减震性能看中底材质：EVA轻但易塌陷寿命短，PU耐久但偏重，Boost/氮气发泡等新型材料回弹好但成本高；追求久站舒适选PU或发泡中底，追求轻便选EVA85% similarUnverified泡棉护角（NBR/EVA）质地更柔软缓冲更好、初期防撞体验优，但不耐水不耐脏、寿命短易压塌；硅胶护角偏硬缓冲略逊但耐用易清洁，可根据碰撞频率取舍76% similarUnverified泡沫（EVA）平衡垫软弹适合站立平衡与老人，但支撑感弱、难度低；充气式（PVC气囊）晃动大、难度高且可调气量，硬质木质摇摆板难度最高适合进阶者71% similarUnverified缓震越强的中底（boost、气垫、超临界发泡）通常越软，但过软会牺牲稳定性和支撑，追求包裹稳定选中等硬度，追求脚感软弹选高回弹泡棉70% similarUnverified全掌气垫（如Air类）回弹好但落地闷、透气差；ETPU发泡（如Boost类）回弹与轻量兼顾但售价高；普通EVA轻便廉价但3-6个月后易塌陷失去缓震69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/153637API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/153637MCP
get_claim(id=153637)