Verified65% confidenceFactExact time
SSPL and BSL licenses are generally considered by OSI as not meeting the open source definition, and the industry refers to them as source-available rather than truly open source.
3
Sources
65%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
7/7/2026
First Seen
Sources
Otari：开源LLM控制平面工具全面解析
hackernewshackernews7/6/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe "open source" in OSINT does not refer to open-source software, but rather to "open sources" in the intelligence sense—meaning all legally and publicly accessible information channels.65% similarUnverifiedOpen source specifically refers to source code publicly released under a specific license that allows others to view, modify, and distribute it, with representative licenses including MIT, GPL, and Apache.64% similarUnverifiedElasticsearch、Redis等项目采用BSL商业源代码许可证63% similarUnverifiedThere is a distinction between open weights and fully open source; according to the Open Source Initiative (OSI) definition, true open source must include complete reproducible information such as training datasets, preprocessing scripts, hyperparameter configurations, and training logs62% similarUnverifiedIn the open-source AI definition draft released by the Open Source Initiative (OSI) in 2024, it was stated that models that only make weight files public without disclosing training data and code should not be recognized as truly open-source software.61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/209493API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/209493MCP
get_claim(id=209493)