Expired50% confidenceOpinionTime unknown
The tester believes that Claude 3.5 Sonnet may have been Anthropic's "one lucky strike," and that subsequent Sonnet 3.7, Sonnet 4, and Sonnet 4.5 have not achieved genuine breakthroughs.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
6/1/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 8/30/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedCompared to the previous generation Sonnet 3.7, Claude 4 Sonnet delivers better intelligence at the same cost and has been optimized for issues of 'excessive eagerness' and reward hacking76% similarUnverifiedAnthropic可能直接跳过了Sonnet 4.7，从4.6直接升级到4.874% similarUnverifiedOn the third-party benchmark Frontier Code launched by Cognition, Sonnet 5 surpasses Opus 4.874% similarUnverifiedClaude 3.7 Sonnet frequently does many things users did not ask it to do, causing the reviewer to revert to using 3.5 Sonnet.74% similarUnverifiedAccording to benchmark data released by Anthropic, Sonnet 4.5 is slightly superior to Claude Opus 4.1 in coding capability.74% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/24358API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/24358MCP
get_claim(id=24358)