Unverified82% confidenceDecision RuleTime unknown
NBR/PU发泡材质缓冲性优于硅胶，硅胶偏硬缓冲差但更耐老化；1岁以内婴儿撞击力小可用硅胶，学步期建议用NBR发泡材质
1
Sources
82%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
-
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified婴幼儿防护优先选硅胶材质（邵氏硬度≤30A），比EVA泡棉更软且回弹性好，撞击缓冲更有效；EVA随时间会硬化变脆80% similarUnverifiedEVA泡棉材质柔软但易被幼儿抠咬撕碎，硅胶材质韧性更好且不易老化开裂，1岁以下爬行/口欲期宝宝家庭优先选一体成型硅胶款79% similarUnverified婴幼儿爬行期（8-18个月）优先选硅胶材质，回弹缓冲优于EVA和泡棉，硅胶邵氏硬度建议在40A以下，撞击时能明显下陷吸能79% similarUnverified婴幼儿防护优先选硅胶材质（邵氏硬度＜30A），比EVA更软且回弹好，硬质塑料桌角撞击缓冲效果差；泡棉虽软但易撕烂误吞，1岁内爬行期慎用78% similarUnverified硅胶材质回弹性好、防撞缓冲效果优于EVA泡棉，但同等厚度下硅胶偏硬；EVA泡棉更柔软吸震但易压缩变形老化，1岁内学步期建议选硅胶，2岁以上活动量大可选EVA77% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/280113API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/280113MCP
get_claim(id=280113)