Expired70% confidenceFactTime unknown
The invocation cost of some open-source or lightweight models (such as Mistral and the Llama series via third-party hosting) may be as low as one-tenth of Claude 3.5 Sonnet's cost or even lower.
1
Sources
70%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
6/1/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 8/30/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAt the time of its release, DeepSeek-V3 matched or surpassed Claude 3.5 Sonnet on multiple benchmarks, with training costs reportedly a fraction of those of mainstream closed-source models.70% similarUnverifiedGLM4's intelligence level is capable of rivaling mainstream commercial closed-source large models such as Claude 3.5 Sonnet, at a lower usage cost.68% similarUnverifiedSmaller models such as Claude Sonnet 4.6 may begin to degrade at 100,000–125,000 tokens.67% similarUnverifiedBased on comparative testing, DeepSeek V4 Pro's programming performance even surpasses Claude Sonnet, and its price is much cheaper.67% similarUnverifiedUsing Claude Sonnet 5 on the Devin platform reduces quota consumption by approximately 30% compared to the previous generation Claude Sonnet 4.6.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/28914API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/28914MCP
get_claim(id=28914)