Expired50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In a needle-in-a-haystack test with a 256K context, both models performed identically, each achieving a score of 93%, with each failing only once at 100% full context depth.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/9/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/7/2026(expired)
Sources
16GB VRAM Showdown: Ornith 35B vs Qwen 35B — Full Benchmark Comparison
bilibili程序员-智能译站7/7/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedAt this compression ratio, the model retains 74.2% top-1% accuracy67% similarUnverifiedIn the same reproduction experiment, ResNet-20 achieved a test accuracy of 90.4% and ResNet-56 achieved a test accuracy of 91.7%, with training accuracies of 97.4% and 99.0% respectively.67% similarUnverifiedThe accuracy data in the test has an error margin of approximately ±8–10 percentage points at n=100 sample size (based on a 95% confidence-level binomial confidence interval).66% similarUnverifiedIn memory tests, retaining the full context allowed the model to accurately locate specific details mentioned by students 95% of the time, whereas after summary compression the accuracy dropped sharply to 32%.66% similarUnverified对同一测试用例执行多次调用统计成功比例得到通过率，比二元的通过/失败判断更能反映模型真实表现66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/342893API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/342893MCP
get_claim(id=342893)