Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Tejal认为模型早已通过图灵测试，但几乎没人讨论，说明图灵测试已失效为AGI判定标准
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
7/9/2026
First Seen
Sources
OpenAI's Head of Evals: We've Been Consistently Underestimating What AI Models Can Really Do
bilibiliGelai_AI7/8/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe model in the testing sandbox was not equipped with all the safeguards available to deployed models, such as classifiers capable of flagging suspicious behavior.62% similarUnverifiedPerplexity has not yet officially published complete benchmark data and a detailed evaluation methodology report.62% similarUnverifiedCursor initially incorrectly claimed that the project had 'nearly zero test coverage, with only a testing framework and no actual test cases,' and only acknowledged the error after the developer pointed it out.62% similarUnverifiedOpenAI's system card acknowledges that benchmarks cannot cover model behavior across all real-world usage scenarios, particularly noting uncertainty when the model is used in combination with other tools.55% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/362877API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/362877MCP
get_claim(id=362877)