Expired60% confidenceFactTime unknown
GLM 4.6's performance on code evaluation benchmarks such as HumanEval, MBPP, and SWE-bench, as well as comprehensive capability benchmarks such as MMLU and GPQA, is on par with Claude 3.4 and Claude 3.4.5.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
6/3/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/1/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedGLM4 scored 74.4% in code reasoning and general knowledge tests, ranking second only to Claude 3 Opus.76% similarUnverified智谱GLM-4系列在HumanEval、MBPP等代码基准测试中达到国际第一梯队水平74% similarUnverifiedOn mainstream benchmarks such as MMLU and HumanEval, the score gaps among Claude 3.5, GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and Grok-2 have been compressed to within the range of statistical error.72% similarUnverifiedGLM-5.3在六项评测中的成绩为：终端编程基准3.0得28.3、深度软件工程基准得66.9、智能体中场考试得28.5、自动化基准得48.2、带工具的人类终极考试得62.5、GDP价值评估AA2版得17.6972% similarUnverifiedGLM-4.7 is a MoE (Mixture of Experts) architecture model with a total parameter count of 358B (358 billion).72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/38492API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/38492MCP
get_claim(id=38492)