Unverified82% confidenceDecision RuleTime unknown
选材质优先PET而非PP：PET透明度更高（雾度＜3%）能真正看清鞋款，PP多为半透明磨砂（雾度＞15%）远看只能辨大致颜色，标价'透明'实为'半透明'的多为PP
1
Sources
82%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
-
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedPET材质透明度最高（透光率88%以上）且不易泛黄，PP材质较PET韧性好但透明度略低偏磨砂感，长期存放需高清可视首选PET材质84% similarUnverifiedPET材质透明度高但脆易裂，PP材质韧性好耐摔但透明度略低带雾感，需要看清内容物选PET，需要频繁搬动或承重选PP83% similarUnverified展示球鞋/手办优先选亚克力材质而非PET，亚克力透明度达92%以上且不易泛黄，PET使用2-3年后会明显发黄影响展示效果80% similarUnverifiedPET材质透明度高但脆易裂，PP材质透明度略低但韧性强抗摔，衣物/杂物收纳选PP，展示类（手办/化妆品）选PET或亚克力80% similarUnverifiedPET材质透明度高但脆，低温易开裂；PP材质透明度略低但耐摔耐低温，冷藏/冷冻收纳选PP，桌面展示类选PET80% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/385919API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/385919MCP
get_claim(id=385919)