Expired80% confidenceOpinionTime unknown
The tester rated Claude Haiku 4.5 as poor or very poor across five dimensions: 3D modeling comprehension, code performance optimization, library reference accuracy, physical logic reasoning, and instruction-following capability
1
Sources
80%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
6/3/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/1/2026(expired)
Sources
Claude Haiku 4.5 Real-World Test: Failed All 5 Programming Tasks
bilibilikarminski-牙医
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedA Bilibili UP host conducted systematic testing of Claude Haiku 4.5 across 5 visual programming tasks, with all results performing poorly81% similarUnverifiedThe elephant toothpaste animation code generated by Claude Haiku 4.5 has serious performance bottlenecks and runs with significant lag68% similarUnverifiedThe design goal of Claude 4.5 Haiku is to compress inference latency to sub-second levels while reducing the token cost per call to a fraction of that of large models.67% similarUnverifiedQuantization is not lossless compression; the lower the precision, the greater the degradation in model inference quality (perplexity, logical reasoning capability), and 4-bit quantization is considered a good balance point between quality and size.65% similarUnverifiedHaiku 4.5 has the lowest rate of misalignment behavior among all models in safety evaluations.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/40310API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/40310MCP
get_claim(id=40310)