Expired75% confidenceOpinionTime unknown
The tester recommends using Claude Sonnet 3.5 or higher-tier models, rather than Claude Haiku 4.5, for scenarios involving code generation, logical reasoning, and spatial understanding
1
Sources
75%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
6/3/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/1/2026(expired)
Sources
Claude Haiku 4.5 Real-World Test: Failed All 5 Programming Tasks
bilibilikarminski-牙医
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the Pillow library RGB-to-HSV precision bug test, Claude Code using the Sonnet 4.6 model passed on the first attempt with clear logic, earning a perfect score.73% similarUnverifiedModels with strong code understanding and generation capabilities (such as Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o) generally perform more stably when handling obfuscated JS.68% similarUnverifiedA Bilibili content creator conducted systematic visual programming task tests on Claude Haiku 4.568% similarVerifiedThe Sonnet model underlying Claude Code consistently leads on mainstream programming benchmarks such as HumanEval and SWE-bench.67% similarUnverifiedThe Claude Sonnet 4 model performs excellently on the programming benchmark SWE-bench, which was developed by Princeton University.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/40311API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/40311MCP
get_claim(id=40311)