Expired60% confidenceFactExact time
GLM 5.2 scored 46.2% on the DeepSU test, outperforming its predecessor GLM 5.1 across coding, reasoning, and general knowledge domains.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/2/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/30/2026(expired)
Sources
GLM 5.2 In-Depth Review: How an Open-Source Model Truly Stacks Up Against Closed-Source Giants
bilibili纳兰仙素6/19/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedGLM 5.2 relies on extremely long chains of thought, with token output that even exceeds that of DeepSeek version 2.6.79% similarUnverifiedGLM 5.3 ranked third, and the engineer alternates between DeepSeek Pro and GLM 5.3 for the planner and reviewer roles.71% similarUnverifiedThe official recommendation is for users to enable deep thinking mode to get the best results from GLM 5.2.67% similarUnverifiedDeepSeek-R1 achieved a resolution rate of 49.2% on the SWE-Bench Verified benchmark.65% similarVerifiedIn domestic large model real-world tests, Zhipu GLM ranked in the first tier for overall capability, and DeepSeek was rated as the best value-for-money option.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/40548API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/40548MCP
get_claim(id=40548)