Unverified85% confidenceDecision RuleTime unknown
剂型优先rTG（复酯型）而非EE（乙酯型）：rTG型生物利用度比EE型高约70%，更接近天然鱼油结构；EE型成本低但吸收差、更易返腥
1
Sources
85%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
-
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified鱼油分子形态优先选rTG（复酯型）而非EE（乙酯型），rTG生物利用率比EE高约70%，但成本更高；EE型价格便宜但吸收差、易氧化。标签看'Triglyceride'或'rTG'字样，未标注多为EE型91% similarUnverified优先选TG型(甘油三酯型)鱼油，其生物利用率比EE型(乙酯型)高约50-70%，EE型是工业浓缩副产物，长期吸收效率较低；标签常见rTG(再酯化型)吸收更优90% similarUnverified采用rTG型（重酯化甘油三酯）剂型，吸收率优于EE型（乙酯型），但价格也相应高于普通EE型鱼油90% similarUnverifiedrTG型（重酯化甘油三酯）鱼油生物利用度高于EE型（乙酯型）约50%，但价格更贵；EE型浓度可做得更高且成本低。日常保健EE型足够，追求高吸收选rTG90% similarUnverifiedrTG型（重酯化甘油三酯）鱼油吸收率比EE型（乙酯型）高约50-70%，但EE型浓缩度可做更高且更便宜；追求吸收和空腹服用选rTG，追求高浓度低价选EE90% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/422815API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/422815MCP
get_claim(id=422815)