Unverified60% confidenceFactExact time
In the 2011 DAgger paper, Ross et al. proved that assuming a model has an error probability of ε at each step, the cumulative error grows at a rate of O(T²) after T steps.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
7/10/2026
First Seen
Sources
Behavior Cloning Training Failing? A Systematic Guide to Data Quality and Tuning
redditr/learnmachinelearning7/9/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn their 2010 analysis, Ross and Bagnell rigorously proved the quadratic accumulation effect of behavior cloning errors, namely that the expected total loss after T steps is O(εT²).74% similarUnverifiedA theoretical study proves that a model can perfectly match energies and forces on the training set yet produce completely wrong statistical behavior when sampling, that is, the distribution-level error does not decrease as local prediction accuracy improves.66% similarUnverifiedIn the τ-bench retail probe, the action model predicted the environment's rejections with precision and recall of 1.000 on 11,763 held-out transitions, abstaining in only 0.26% of cases.63% similarUnverifiedIn the LLM routing scenario, E2D.PMSide estimates the success probability of weak models via a regression oracle, achieving comparable answer quality at lower inference cost.63% similarUnverifiedThe oracle router knows in advance which cases the small model will get wrong, sends only the wrong requests to the large model, and achieves accuracy comparable to always using the large model at only 29% of the cost.63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/464202API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/464202MCP
get_claim(id=464202)