Expired50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The performance of models such as DeepSeek and GLM integrated into Claude Code is noticeably inferior to Opus on complex projects.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/2/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/30/2026(expired)
Sources
Claude Code Practical Guide: From Installation & Configuration to Production-Grade Project Delivery
bilibiliAI大模型研习社6/15/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedTechnically, Claude Code can be connected to other models such as DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM 5.1, but the gap in effectiveness compared to the Opus model is enormous.78% similarUnverifiedDeepSeek-Coder、CodeLlama等模型验证了专用编程模型路线的可行性，70B级专用模型可与规模更大的通用模型持平甚至超越70% similarUnverifiedWhen testing different model backends under Claude Code's Agent framework, DeepSeek Professional performed the strongest, MiniMax was in the middle, and DeepSeek Flash was last but still outperformed local small models.69% similarUnverifiedDeepThink has released a multimodal model and related technical report, focusing on the shortcomings of multimodal large models in cross-perceptual-domain reasoning chains.68% similarUnverifiedConnecting Claude Code Desktop to DeepSeek models is described as significantly more economical than using Anthropic's official models68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/46539API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/46539MCP
get_claim(id=46539)