Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
在代码Review测试中，K2.6消耗97.7k Token找到7个真问题得9分，K2.7-Code消耗83.3k Token找到6个真问题得8.5分
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/2/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/30/2026
Sources
Kimi K2.7-Code vs K2.6实测对比：五道硬核题谁更强？
bilibili寒冰巨魔95276/14/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedK2.7-Code消耗298.6k Token，K2.6消耗288.9k Token，K2.7-Code多消耗约10%79% similarUnverifiedK2.7-Code总质量得分为153.5分，K2.6总质量得分为79分，K2.7-Code领先74.5分70% similarUnverifiedKimi K2.7 Code在MCP Mark Verified基准测试上得分81.1，相比K2.6的72.8提升11.4%65% similarUnverified最终结果为6/6数值测试通过，0个依赖漏洞，转换1,775个模块，生产JavaScript约213.6 kB，Gzip后约68.5 kB64% similarPartially Verified与K2.6相比，K2.7 Code在Kimi Code Bench VR基准测试上提升21.8%（从50.9提升至62.0）64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/46913API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/46913MCP
get_claim(id=46913)