Expired65% confidenceFactExact time
This evaluation conducted a horizontal comparison of five models: Claude Opus 4.8, GPT 5.5, MiniMax M3, Mimo 2.5 Pro, and DeepSeek V4 Pro.
3
Sources
65%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/2/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/30/2026(expired)
Sources
5 Models Coding Showdown: Claude, GPT, DeepSeek, M3 — Who's the Best Engineering Tool?
bilibili不正经的前端啊6/8/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe GPT-5.6 series achieves performance equal to or higher than Opus 4.8 and Fable 5 at a lower cost across multiple benchmarks.79% similarUnverifiedDeepSeek V4 Pro scored higher than GPT 5.4, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and Kimi K2.6 on the MCP Atlas and Toolethlon Agent benchmarks, ranking second only to GPT 5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7.76% similarUnverifiedThe overall capability gap among mainstream large models such as GPT-4o, Claude 3.5, and DeepSeek V3 has narrowed to within 5%.76% similarUnverifiedThe two projects tested had previously gone through one round of development using a combination of Claude Opus 4.5 and GPT-5.5.75% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/47196API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/47196MCP
get_claim(id=47196)