Expired80% confidenceFactExact time
The Apache 2.0 license requires modifications to be documented, while the GPL license requires that derivative works also be open-sourced
6
Sources
80%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/2/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/30/2026(expired)
Sources
Hermes Desktop Officially Launched: A Forever-Free, Self-Evolving AI Agent for Your Desktop
bilibili比特光锥_BightCone6/13/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe Apache 2.0 license, unlike the GPL family, allows users to integrate code into closed-source commercial products and includes explicit patent grant clauses, whereas the MIT license does not include an explicit grant of patent rights.78% similarUnverified开源许可证（如 MIT、Apache 2.0）授权代码使用权，并在法律层面赋予社区进行内容创作和传播的自由75% similarUnverifiedCopyleft licenses (such as GPL, LGPL, and AGPL) require that derivative works be released under the same or compatible open-source licenses.74% similarVerifiedThe Apache 2.0 license allows enterprises to freely modify and distribute code, requiring only compliance with the license terms, without creating a technical dependency on a single commercial vendor.71% similarUnverifiedUnder permissive open-source licenses like MIT and Apache, developers can legally reuse, modify, and redistribute others' code as long as they retain the original author's attribution71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/47339API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/47339MCP
get_claim(id=47339)