Expired50% confidenceFactExact time
Claude (Opus 4.7) tends to forget some requirements when handling multi-part parallel demands, while GPT 5.5 has the lowest rate of missing requirements.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/2/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/30/2026(expired)
Sources
DeepSWE Benchmark Reveals the Truth: GPT 5.5 Leads Opus 4.7 by a Wide Margin
bilibili7k的每日搬运5/29/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedSam Altman stated that due to improved reasoning capabilities, the actual number of tokens consumed per task by GPT-5.5 is fewer than that of GPT-5.4.74% similarUnverifiedMultimodal large models such as GPT-4V and Claude 3 have lowered the development barrier for document understanding tasks.73% similarPartially VerifiedAll three GPT-5.6 models achieved a perfect score of 10 on the long-horizon agent fine-tuning task, while GPT-5.5 and Opus 4.7 could only score two or three points on that task.73% similarUnverifiedGPT-5.6 still has a tendency toward over-engineering, requiring human correction to prevent it from overcomplicating simple requirements.73% similarUnverifiedFor top-tier models such as GPT-4o, the necessity of Few-Shot prompting has diminished because their instruction-following capabilities are sufficiently strong.73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/47591API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/47591MCP
get_claim(id=47591)