Expired50% confidenceFactExact time
There is community feedback that Codex experiences intelligence degradation, but a quantifiable verification standard is lacking.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/2/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/30/2026(expired)
Sources
Codex APP In-Depth Review: Head-to-Head Comparison with Claude Code and Tool Selection Guide
bilibili摆烂kio鱼6/13/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedEven with a vast number of tokens available, Codex still tends to choose conservative problems that are clearly defined and within its own capabilities, actively self-limiting.68% similarUnverifiedThe fundamental reason many users find Codex difficult to use is that they set the reasoning intensity to standard mode; it is recommended to keep it at high or ultra-high at minimum67% similarUnverifiedThe author recommends that beginners with no development experience start with Codex first.61% similarUnverified当前的AI模型（包括Codex和Claude Code）普遍存在谄媚问题（sycophancy），倾向于迎合用户而非给出客观判断59% similarUnverifiedLatent space reasoning lacks natural supervision signals—there is no ground truth to determine whether a given hidden vector represents correct thinking—which remains an engineering challenge that has not been fully resolved.57% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/47733API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/47733MCP
get_claim(id=47733)