Unverified60% confidenceFactExact time
在Dino Run游戏生成测试中，Minimax M3生成的游戏视觉质量明显优于DeepSeek V4 Pro
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/2/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/30/2026
Sources
Minimax M3 vs DeepSeek V4 Hands-On Test: Who Builds a Better Dino Run Game?
bilibili小弟姚安6/10/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedDeepSeek V4 Pro生成的恐龙快跑游戏可以正常运行且有部分音效，但画面精美度不及M376% similarUnverified在CLI40命令行操作测试中，DeepSeek V4 Flash表现最好，超过了V4 Pro71% similarUnverified在Three.js可变速齿轮机械动画测试中，DeepSeek V4 Pro的效果远超此前V4 Flash版本，与Kimi K3基本持平66% similarUnverified天玑机型的GPU能效（Immortalis-G925等Arm架构）在图形性能上已追平骁龙，但游戏适配深度上骁龙生态更成熟，冷门手游或VR应用可能存在优化不足，重度冷门游戏玩家需谨慎65% similarUnverifiedDeepSeek将实验性多模态模型V4-Flash-Vision-EXP上线API平台，其文本能力与V4 Flash持平，多模态智能体基准测试性能接近Opus 4.8水平64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/48384API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/48384MCP
get_claim(id=48384)