Expired60% confidenceFactExact time
According to hands-on tests by a Bilibili content creator, both Claude Code and DeepSeek were used to have AI autonomously build Simulink models; the simulation results from both approaches reported no errors, but both had issues and could not run completely normally.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/2/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/30/2026(expired)
Sources
DeepSeek + Claude Code: A Deep Dive into How AI Automatically Builds Simulink Models
bilibili重新出发----6/12/2026
Related Claims
VerifiedWhen Claude Code is paired with the DeepSeek model, there are differences in the stability of tool use and multi-step reasoning compared to Claude's native model, and the actual experience did not meet expectations.75% similarUnverifiedFor automatically building Simulink models with AI, Option 1 is to have Claude Code take full responsibility (better results, higher cost), and Option 2 is to have Claude Code handle front-end understanding while DeepSeek handles back-end generation (better cost-effectiveness).71% similarUnverifiedThe HARIS engineering framework does not reach maximum efficiency when Claude Code CLI is connected to third-party models such as DeepSeek.71% similarUnverifiedClaude Code allows free selection of models, including use cases paired with the DeepSeek series of models.70% similarUnverifiedClaude Code's Plan mode has already demonstrated counter-questioning programming capabilities, and Alibaba's Coder is also experimenting with similar interaction approaches.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/48453API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/48453MCP
get_claim(id=48453)