Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
单纯由LLM输出的未经形式化验证的自然语言证明，其可信度几乎为零
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
7/11/2026
First Seen
Sources
Can AI Prove Mathematical Conjectures? The Truth Behind the GPT-5.6 Incident and the Limits of Large Language Models
hackernewshackernews7/10/2026
Related Claims
Unverified大语言模型（LLM）不具备意图，因此严格意义上无法撒谎70% similarUnverifiedThe output of large language models inherently appears plausible (fluency bias), meaning that even when the reasoning chain is wrong, the generated natural language remains grammatically correct and natural in tone, rendering traditional monitoring approaches based on output format or exception capture ineffective.65% similarUnverifiedLLMs lack grounding capability and cannot verify generated linguistic symbols against real-world states.62% similarUnverifiedMainstream large language models show significantly reduced accuracy when understanding obfuscated bundles with extremely long contexts (tens of thousands of lines) and may hallucinate on custom encryption variants.60% similarUnverifiedThe language models used in traditional speech recognition are usually lightweight N-gram models or small RNNs with limited capability.60% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/487648API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/487648MCP
get_claim(id=487648)