Unverified60% confidenceFactExact time
During the pre-training phase, LLMs optimize token prediction probability through maximum likelihood estimation, lacking an inherent mechanism to 'know what they don't know,' and there is no necessary correlation between confidence and accuracy.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
7/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
The Rise of AI Slop Code: How Teams Can Tackle the "Vibe Coding" Crisis
redditr/cursor7/11/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedSelf-supervised learning does not require manual annotation; instead, it constructs supervision signals by predicting the next token from the given preceding context, which is the key to scaling up LLM training.79% similarVerifiedAlignment training optimizes the model's statistical behavior in known scenarios rather than establishing formally verifiable security boundaries, and may fail when faced with rare instruction combinations or role-playing frameworks outside the training distribution.75% similarUnverifiedThe no-information baseline refers to the performance level when the model receives no rule information, usually close to random guessing or relying on training set bias.74% similarUnverified小模型通过知识蒸馏通常比直接在标注数据上训练精度高出2-5个百分点73% similarUnverifiedResearch on SelectPFN proved a negative result: training in the average case does not automatically translate into frequentist guarantees under a fixed ground truth, so controlling the false discovery rate on any given dataset requires additional mechanisms.72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/491024API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/491024MCP
get_claim(id=491024)