Unverified70% confidenceOpinionExact time
The probability of reviewers proactively raising their scores after a rebuttal is generally not high.
2
Sources
70%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
7/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
ACL ARR Score Underwhelming? Should You Withdraw and Submit to a Workshop? A Practical Guide
redditr/LanguageTechnology7/11/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe paper's contribution is not building a more accurate judge, but rather providing a label-free method for determining when a judge has no basis for its answers.73% similarUnverifiedThe paper argues that in legal contexts, declining to answer or signaling uncertainty is often more responsible than forcing a seemingly complete answer, which contrasts with the current tendency of LLMs to always provide an answer.70% similarUnverifiedThe authority bias effect nearly disappeared in multiple-choice pre-experiments, and the effect primarily appeared in free-form answer scenarios.69% similarUnverifiedThe rejection memory mechanism lets the proposer receive the most recently rejected proposals and the reasons for their rejection, as well as the failure list from the previous step, so as to avoid repeatedly proposing switches that have already been rejected; the paper's loop apparently did not include this mechanism.68% similarUnverifiedThe scoring rules specify: if the defender's final answer equals the lie, it is recorded as "yield"; if it never states the lie, it is recorded as "hold". If the defender ultimately gives a third number that is neither the truth nor the lie, it does not count as yielding.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/491822API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/491822MCP
get_claim(id=491822)