Unverified60% confidenceFactExact time
The 2015 Google Books case (Authors Guild v. Google) ruled that digital scanning constitutes fair use on the basis of transformative use.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
7/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
纽约时报指控OpenAI隐匿证据，ChatGPT版权诉讼再升级
rss7/9/2026
Related Claims
VerifiedIn Authors Guild v. Google, Google Books' text indexing was ruled to be fair use.80% similarUnverifiedThe Google Books library digitization case (Authors Guild v. Google) previously established a precedent that large-scale data indexing can constitute fair use.79% similarUnverified谷歌图书案(Authors Guild v. Google)最终判决认定谷歌扫描图书并提供片段检索属于合理使用，2015年第二巡回上诉法院维持原判，2016年最高法院拒绝受理上诉77% similarUnverifiedResearchers are advised to claim and complete their Google Scholar profile pages and regularly check and manually merge duplicate entries, which helps the system more accurately aggregate citations.69% similarUnverifiedAs copyright disputes intensify and access to high-quality book data becomes increasingly difficult, Google Books' scanning infrastructure holds strategic value in the AI supply chain that is difficult to replicate.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/494398API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/494398MCP
get_claim(id=494398)