Expired50% confidencePredictionExact time
The outcome of this case will determine whether AI companies must pay copyright fees for training data in the future.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/13/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/11/2026(expired)
Sources
纽约时报指控OpenAI隐匿证据，ChatGPT版权诉讼再升级
rss7/9/2026
Related Claims
Unverified《纽约时报》诉OpenAI案的判决结果将决定未来AI公司是否必须为训练数据支付版权费用85% similarUnverifiedThe U.S. Copyright Office's 2023 AI copyright guidelines have not yet clearly defined the copyright ownership of model outputs used as training data.69% similarVerifiedIn 2023, the Beijing Internet Court ruled in an AI painting case that if a user invests sufficient intellectual labor in prompt design and parameter adjustment, the generated result can receive copyright protection.67% similarUnverifiedIn March 2023, the U.S. Copyright Office issued formal policy guidance confirming that works containing AI-generated material require case-by-case review, with the core criterion being whether a human exercised sufficient creative control over the final expression.64% similarVerifiedGetty Images v. Stability AI and the artists' collective lawsuit v. Stability AI are AI training data copyright cases currently being heard in the United States.60% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/497641API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/497641MCP
get_claim(id=497641)