Unverified70% confidenceOpinionExact time
Rebuttal can improve scores but has limited effect; its core value lies in clarifying reviewers' misunderstandings, supplementing experimental data, and resolving reproducibility disagreements.
2
Sources
70%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
7/13/2026
First Seen
Sources
Can a 2.5 Overall Score Get Accepted at EMNLP? A Deep Dive into Review Scoring
redditr/learnmachinelearning7/12/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe Response should be consistent with the Rebuttal, as SACs can see the full review history and inconsistencies will seriously undermine credibility.75% similarUnverifiedThe core idea for fixing silent failures is: recovery and reporting are two separate jobs and should not be merged; wrappers should retry as before but record the attempt count and mark the span before returning a final failure; a step cap should hand back a separate termination reason; a narrow catch should record the exception before recovering; the parser should run in strict mode; and when falling back, the model that actually answered should be recorded.71% similarUnverified当rebuttal无法有效影响评分时，整个评审系统就失去了自我修正的能力，破坏了评审分数作为质量信号的可信度70% similarUnverified"Rebasing" means that when a report is rebuilt due to staleness, each assumption's baseline value is updated to the current live value, and the next comparison starts from there. This avoids error accumulation, at the cost of losing a global view of long-term drift.70% similarUnverifiedThe key difference between reconciliation and retry is: retry assumes the previous operation failed and actively executes the side effect again, whereas reconciliation assumes the result is unknown and only performs read-only queries, so it produces no new side effects.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/501578API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/501578MCP
get_claim(id=501578)