Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
MIT、BSD等宽松协议不包含专利授权条款
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
7/15/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Claims
VerifiedApache 2.0 includes explicit patent grant clauses and patent retaliation clauses, whereas MIT/BSD do not.73% similarUnverifiedThe MIT License does not require code to be publicly released in order to take effect.73% similarUnverifiedThe MIT License permits closed-source commercial use, with the only requirement being that copyright and license notices be included in all copies; unlike the GPL license, it has no copyleft effect.72% similarUnverifiedThe Apache 2.0 license, unlike the GPL family, allows users to integrate code into closed-source commercial products and includes explicit patent grant clauses, whereas the MIT license does not include an explicit grant of patent rights.64% similarVerifiedMIT License是最宽松的开源许可协议，几乎可以随意使用，只需保留版权声明63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/519410API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/519410MCP
get_claim(id=519410)