Expired80% confidenceFactTime unknown
The code generated by Gemini 3.5 Flash had multiple issues, including an abnormal halo effect, fish too large to interact with, and non-functioning feeding and aging mechanics.
1
Sources
80%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
5/31/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 8/29/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedTech creator Theo reported that Gemini 3.5 Flash performed poorly in real-world coding tasks after getting early access.77% similarUnverifiedGemini 3.5 Flash has serious hallucination issues, a sycophantic behavioral pattern, and an extremely low tendency to proactively search the internet.75% similarUnverifiedIn a hands-on coding test, tech blogger Theo found that Gemini 3.5 Flash was the only model among all tested that failed to get the game running properly.73% similarUnverifiedIn a front-end code generation test, Gemini 3 Flash produced a page featuring interactive details such as a smoothly animated rotating electric fan and mouse-hover tooltips.69% similarUnverifiedGemini 3.5 Flash's coding capability benchmark score is 76.2%.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/5299API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/5299MCP
get_claim(id=5299)