Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
Brown等人2020年的GPT-3论文发现仅通过改变提示格式,同一模型在标准基准测试上的表现可相差30%以上
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
7/16/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Claims
Unverified在GPT-4发布初期,主流模型在GPQA上的准确率约为35-40%,人类领域专家基准线约为65%,随机猜测为25%66% similarUnverifiedQwen3's 235B-parameter MoE flagship model approaches or surpasses closed-source top-tier models on multiple authoritative benchmarks.66% similarUnverifiedOn the coding index (reasoning mode) in third-party evaluations by Artificial Analysis, GPT-5 Mini High scored 9 points higher than Haiku 4.563% similarUnverifiedThe original Codex achieved a pass@1 score of 28.8% on the HumanEval benchmark, whereas using GPT-3 directly yielded only 0%.63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/530353API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/530353MCP
get_claim(id=530353)