Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time

Ithaca模型缺失文字预测准确率约62%，人类专家独立完成时约为25%，地理来源推断约71%，年代估算误差中位数约30年

1

Sources

50%

Confidence

Long-term

Relevance

7/17/2026

First Seen

Sources

How Does AI Track Ancient Roman Thieves? A Deep Dive into Antigravity's Historical Reasoning

Related Claims

UnverifiedIthaca模型推断铭文地理来源准确率约71%，估算年代误差中位数约30年84% similar Unverified当人类专家与AI（Ithaca）协作时，缺失文字预测准确率从专家独立工作的25%提升至约57%81% similar UnverifiedWhen samples are severely imbalanced, Accuracy becomes misleading—a model that predicts everyone as healthy can still achieve an accuracy of over 99%.64% similar

Cite This Claim

Stable URI

https://kongchang.com/claim/536355

API

curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/536355

MCP

get_claim(id=536355)