Expired50% confidenceFactTime unknown
GitHub Copilot and Cursor have faced controversy over vague language in their terms of service regarding code data usage
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/2/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/30/2026(expired)
Sources
UE5.7 AI Assistant Plugin Hands-On: What Can It Do? What Can't It Do?
bilibili章鱼烧烤酱
Related Claims
UnverifiedMainstream AI programming tools such as GitHub Copilot and Cursor have previously sparked controversy due to ambiguous wording in their terms of service regarding the use of code data.82% similarUnverifiedIn certain offline scenarios, GitHub Copilot automatically degrades to local language service suggestions, whereas Cursor currently has relatively limited local fault-tolerance capabilities.74% similarUnverifiedGitHub Copilot has primarily served development environments such as VS Code and JetBrains in the form of a plugin, with its value concentrated in scenarios such as code completion, comment generation, and unit test writing.68% similarVerifiedUnlike code completion tools such as GitHub Copilot, Cursor places greater emphasis on global project comprehension capabilities68% similarPartially VerifiedGitHub Copilot has limited understanding of entire codebases and relatively weaker refactoring capabilities compared to other AI coding tools.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/54393API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/54393MCP
get_claim(id=54393)