Expired50% confidenceFactExact time
Early MCP specifications were designed primarily for local development scenarios and lacked comprehensive authentication standards
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/2/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/30/2026(expired)
Sources
LangGraph 0.5.3 + MCP Agent Development in Practice: Security Authentication & Deployment Guide
bilibiliAI大模型升升4/16/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedLocal small models may not support calling MCP tools71% similarUnverifiedMCP currently remains focused on standardizing tool discovery and invocation formats, while fine-grained permission management control has not yet been incorporated into the core protocol constraints.70% similarUnverifiedThe problem of MCP tools not appearing often lies in the initialization phase, where a protocol version mismatch or excessively large SDK version discrepancy causes the handshake to fail.68% similarUnverifiedMCP distinguishes between protocol-level errors (such as connection drops and timeouts) and tool-level errors (such as invalid parameters and insufficient permissions).66% similarUnverifiedPi Agent 的原始设计早于 MCP 协议的推行，其工具调用采用自有接口规范，与 MCP 标准不直接兼容66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/58549API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/58549MCP
get_claim(id=58549)