Expired50% confidenceFactExact time
When biosecurity/cybersecurity-sensitive requests that would trigger the safety classifiers of closed-source models are added, the output quality of DeepSeek V4 drops sharply.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/23/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/21/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Claims
Unverified原生App的分层认证设计安全性高于Web端，但引入更多单点故障风险，任何一层出问题整条链路即中断62% similarUnverifiedSafety classifiers are highly sensitive to request phrasing; asking the model directly to find vulnerabilities is easily intercepted and routed to Opus 4.8, whereas neutral descriptions tend not to trigger restrictions.62% similarUnverifiedIn testing, DeepSeek directly rejected prompts requesting the generation of code related to cyberattacks, explaining that the request exceeded the scope of its safety guidelines.61% similarUnverifiedWhen facing highly confrontational protection schemes such as deep obfuscation with VMP virtual machine protection, WASM binary encryption, and dynamic keys, the actual performance of AI still requires more validation.60% similarUnverifiedMicrosoft rated the Copilot vulnerability as Low Severity and carried out partial fixes—such as restricting Copilot's ability to render clickable hyperlinks—but the fundamental attack vector for data exfiltration has not been fully eliminated.60% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/597087API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/597087MCP
get_claim(id=597087)