Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In a test building a personal CRM system, DeepSeek V4 Pro took approximately 1 hour and cost $2.56.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/24/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/22/2026
Sources
开源模型能替代Claude吗？GLM 5.2 vs DeepSeek实测对比
bilibili程序员-智能译站7/10/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn a test building a personal CRM system, GLM 5.2 took 1 hour and 15 minutes and cost $4.15.74% similarUnverifiedDeveloping a motion-sensing fruit-slicing game using the DeepSeek V4 Pro model took approximately 19 minutes, achieved a cache hit rate of 99%, and consumed only a little over two yuan in token fees.68% similarUnverifiedDeepSeek V3 takes approximately 10 minutes to handle environment supplementation tasks using this solution at extremely low cost; Claude handles the same task in approximately 2–3 minutes but at a higher cost.66% similarUnverifiedThe 3D road-crossing game test used 4 prompts, taking 5 hours, 544 model calls, and approximately 23 USD.64% similarUnverifiedIn a comparative test of 'building a retro game editor,' the single Agent took 20 minutes and cost $9, resulting in broken core functionality; the three-Agent system took 6 hours and cost $200, resulting in a feature-rich and actually playable product62% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/606451API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/606451MCP
get_claim(id=606451)