Unverified60% confidenceFactExact time
Before ARR, ACL-affiliated conferences each had independent review processes, requiring authors to resubmit rejected papers at the next conference deadline with potentially different reviewers
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
8/2/2026
First Seen
Sources
EMNLP Submission Guide: A Deep Dive into the ARR Rolling Review Mechanism
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedFindings papers undergo rigorous peer review, are included in the ACL Anthology with official DOI numbers, carry equal weight to main conference papers in academic citations, but typically do not receive oral presentation or poster display opportunities.68% similarUnverifiedArea Chairs (ACs) are responsible for overseeing the review process for a group of papers, synthesizing the opinions of multiple reviewers and then making acceptance or rejection recommendations to the program chairs.66% similarUnverifiedDesk Reject means that a paper is directly rejected by an editor, area chair (AC) or program committee before entering formal peer review, usually without detailed review comments.63% similarUnverifiedSome conferences have tried mechanisms such as desk reject, mandatory format checks, and reviewer training to filter out clearly substandard submissions.60% similarUnverifiedThe most persuasive reason for bringing the situation to the AC's attention is that the review clearly violates conference rules, rather than that the reviewer did not respond.59% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/679767API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/679767MCP
get_claim(id=679767)