Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
Reddit社区的大规模基准测试基于BeeLlama.cpp v0.4.0，在Qwen 3.6 27B和Gemma 4 31B两款模型上累计跑了413组配置对比，其中Qwen模型238组、Gemma模型175组
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
8/8/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/6/2026
Sources
Related Claims
UnverifiedQwen2.5-Coder 系列由阿里巴巴通义实验室出品，其32B参数版本在多项指标上超越了GPT-4o71% similarUnverifiedQwen2.5-72B approaches the performance of Llama-3.1-405B across multiple benchmarks.71% similarUnverifiedQwen3.6-27B's benchmark scores place it at the leading position among models of similar scale (20B–30B parameter range).67% similarUnverifiedQwen3.6-27B comprehensively surpasses previous-generation Qwen series flagship models with larger parameter counts across multiple benchmark dimensions.67% similarUnverifiedIn a complex task test involving the generation of a visualization HTML for six sorting algorithms, Gemini 3.1 and Qwen 3.5 400B succeeded, while the local version of QwenCoder 80B failed.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/707990API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/707990MCP
get_claim(id=707990)